Category Archives: Architecture

A Learning Experience

Purchasing a house is quite a learning experience.

I have learned that not everyone is looking out for your best interests all of the time.  I have learned that you need to establish your credentials as an individual educated in the building trades and as a design professional as early as possible.  And I have learned that no matter how much planning, looking, research or preparation you do in advance, somebody will screw something up at some point in the process.

Fortunately, these lessons were learned without much physical harm to us or our purchasing process (yet). But it is very apparent that if you identify yourselves as first-time home buyers and look even remotely young, you will be battling for control over the process every step of the way. In these situations it has been our research, past time spent looking, and strategically placed connections with individuals in all manner of building trades and banking positions that have saved us some headaches.

Experimenting with paint colors in the likley case of the bank appraisal requiring exterior painting.

It is my sincere hope that the majority of home buyers are genuinely not as ignorant as the real estate agents seem to treat us.  On a positive note, it has been quite amusing to catch them in their little “white lies” or stumble them up on a technical question to an issue they are trying desperately to glean over while displaying an air of understanding.

I am sure not all real estate agents are this manipulative, we will just be more careful with our selection process next time.

So, now that that is out, an update: the purchase offer was accepted, the contract was signed, the engineers inspection was completed with no surprises, the radon test said we are safe, and the mortgage application has been delayed because the guy filling out the paperwork made a mistake. The final contingency is the bank appraisal and the lawyers negotiating the final details of the contract before closing.

We took a break this past weekend from wrangling greased-up mortgage brokers and pompous real estate agents to partake in a day trip to NYC.  My father-in-law, home briefly from his job overseas, wanted to take the whole family to see the New York Yankees play at the new Yankee Stadium.

Our seats were high enough to be in the shade, a welcome respite from the oppressive heat, but if you squinted your eyes it looked like the players were miniature toys.

1 Comment

Filed under Architecture, Family, Houses, Photoshop

The Geography of Nowhere

“The Geography of Nowhere:  The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-made Landscape” by James Howard Kunstler was a uniquely fascinating study about how technological  “progress” and societal “advancements” have destroyed our ability to recognize, appreciate, and plan for quality spaces.

This has been an observation I have been wrestling with for several years now and am often discouraged by the lack of interest fellow citizens share in this area.  I became aware of this effect gradually as I was learning to be more observant during University, and was simply incapable of ignoring the blatant displays of ignorance while living in the city.  Even now, every day as I drive through Gananda, NY, which in my views stands as the pinnacle that represents the obsolesce and individualism that was the catalyst for Kunstler to write this book and make me physically terrified of the nightmare fuel that is the housing development.

Before I get carried away, let me describe the book;  the first six chapters are essentially an entertaining review of every American architectural text studied during an architectural education.  With the exception of the progressive vernacular, I could have skipped both Arch. History I and II in favor of this book and barley skipped a beat (exaggeration).  The remainder of the books could be briefly, if less persuasively, summed up as a literary attack on cars.  Kunstler seems to despise cars and at every turn places the blame for our current housing model squarely on the shoulders of the developing automobile industry and those who stand to have the most to gain from its success.  Even as far back as Henry Ford and his production assembly line are not safe from critical review, but Kunstler refrains from pushing too hard in that direction, apparently due to that fact that as Ford grew late in life he was apologetic about his contributions to the degradation of the community lifestyle.

This book gained an additional level of local interest as Kunstler is from Saratoga Springs, NY and uses the town as a blunt case study, often not very flatteringly.  He also manages to mention other upstate New York cities, (Rochester, Syracuse, Palmyra) and even some local corporations, (The Pyramid Group, and the Wilmorite Corporation).  The local origination of the author makes the lessons in the book a much harder pill to swallow as it is difficult to separate our communities from those discussed.  I am unable, in this case, to point to the examples discussed and consider my communities different or exempt, as would potentially be possible if written from the perspective of an individual residing on the west coast or down south.

the burbs

The primary concerns, as I understand them, is that……as if it were that simple.

There have been many factors that have led us to where we are today and, without exception, every corner of this nation is plighted with poor spaces outlined in this book.  A favorite passage that attempts a summation of the evils of our culture follows:

“The tragic thing is that there existed in America a fine heritage of regional home-building traditions, rich with values and meanings, and we threw it all away. Vestigial symbols of that tradition remain – the screw-on plastic shutters, fanlights with pop-in mullions, vinyl clapboards, the fakey front portico too narrow to put a chair on – but the building culture from which these details derive is as lost as the music of the Aztecs.”

The most frightening part is that this book was written in 1993 and more than 15 years later the mistakes we were making are only amplified and suburbia continues to grow.  A pure example of this is the “master-planned” community of Gananda, NY.  For those unfamiliar, Gananda is a community development east of Rochester in which people just want to live.  The community is organized along a 4-mile collection road without a single house on it. Along the collection road are a number of housing developments and the backs of houses and metal storage sheds, all facing away from the road.  The cohesion within the community is provided by Gananda Central School, but few children can walk or ride their bikes as nearly every home in the district is forced onto this busy collection road to get from their houses to the school.  There are no commercial zones or shopping centers, just a handful of conveniences catering to the automobile as an individual (gas station, car wash, drive through ATM) and I hear rumors of a pizza place but have never actually seen it.  I am sure that certain residents of this developed community would have the capacity to provide some reasoning for the existence of such a dysfunctional community environment, but as it stands now I turn down the radio volume and get involuntary somber as my daily commute takes me though the unnatural place.

As a final thought, it would be interesting to see how the tone of this book would be different if written during or after the financial fiasco of recent years.  Perhaps Kunstler will publish a follow-up titled, “I Told You So”.

4 Comments

Filed under Architecture, Books

Zoology

Since I managed not to upload the photographs from this past weekend I will postpone my weekend report until later this week.  In substitution I submit a post that I wrote back in spring 2009 as part of a previous attempt to connect and foster design related conversation among a few former roommates and architectural colleagues.  That attempt ended rather unceremoniously but perhaps the post could serve to foster greater conversation or comment on this forum.  Enjoy.

Each time I visit the Buffalo Zoological Garden I am overcome with nostalgia and the powerful sense of history.  This past weekend I did just that, in a sort of follow-up visit to my research trips last year.

During my last year at school I spent many hours studying the forms and functions of the Buffalo Zoo in anticipation of an attractive new addition to the facility.  My senior thesis design project was based around this new addition, as well as the revitalization and reorganization of the zoo.  As the construction company was building Rainforest Falls, the new walk through exhibit that utilizes the concepts of immersive design and natural barriers, I was developing an alternate project.  Using the same zoological concepts I incorporated a bit more “architecture.”

The history of the third oldest zoo in the country is a great one, and while I find the story fascinating, unfortunately there are far too many intricacies to fully develop a competent discussion on this venue.  The original Zoological Garden, as well as many of the other public parks throughout Buffalo, were designed by the great American landscape architect Fredrick Law Olmstead in 1875, and until now, very little of the original form has been altered.  Olmstead’s formal organization and symmetrical balance have been preserved, I believe, to the benefit of the zoo.

So many of the “modern” zoos simply result from a series of disconnected additions and renovations as funding becomes available.  As a result the visitor circulation, exhibit organization, and overall cohesion of the facility suffer greatly.  The advantage of age that the Buffalo Zoo has is clearly apparent, from the large iron gates at the entrance ticket booths to the universal rusticated buildings.  Unfortunately, due to size limitations, the newly opened Rainforest exhibit had to compromise some of the primary organizational principles of the site.  Fortunately, the designers saw fit to use similar rustication techniques on the exterior cladding of the exhibit as on the existing buildings.

The design thesis I presented last spring featured a very literal interpretation of Olmstead’s formal symmetry as well as a rather fantastical budget for the sparse funding of a small zoo.  The design was based on the most ideal conditions available, a feature I am afraid was lost on the limited vision of the guest critics.  I spent much of the allotted time studying zoo design principles, learning much about topics such as deep green design, landscape immersion concepts, naturalistic enrichment, and basic zoo visitor circulation.  Many of these lessons were taught by Jon Coe, a renowned Australian landscape architect who specializes in zoo design around the world.  I am sure in the posts to follow I will discuss several of these concepts.  It is an extremely interesting and enticing opportunity to design a common area for the human program requirements and that of any number of additional species with a vast array of additional program requirements.

At some point in the future I hope to break into the zoo design arena.  Have the opportunity to combine architecture, landscape design, and environmental program requirements in a cohesive project.  To blend the lines between human visitors and animal residents.  To weave the circulation paths of animal, visitors, and zoo keepers.  To weigh the sensitive balance of priority between animals and humans.  To tackle the problem of creating a regionally distinct exhibit within a large uniform context.

I did not end up posting more articles concerning the concepts I discovered while preparing for this thesis, nor have I yet broken into the zoo design arena.  It remains an area of strong interest for me however as the issues of sustainable design and responsible landscape for traditional buildings continue to weigh heavily on the consciousness of architects and planners.  The paramount question that resonates in my mind as the singularly most controversial regarding the question of zoological design is that of priority:

Which user group should be given the most consideration when designing zoo exhibits, visitors, keepers, or animals?  You could argue the animals, they are there longest.  But what of the visitors, if the environment is not comfortable for visitors they will not come, then there will be no funding.  And what of keepers, isn’t their safety and ability to treat and care for the animals the most important?  It seems the correct response to this weighted question resides subjectively in the one responsible for the answer.

What is your opinion?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Architecture, Sustainability